POWER ANALYSIS ATTACKS AND CRYPTOGRAPHIC SCHEME DESIGN IN QUANTUM DOT TECHNOLOGY
Keywords:
Power analysis attack, Random number generation, Pseudorandom generator, Entropy, Cryptography, Simulation.Abstract
Quantum-dot Cellular Automata (QCA) technology is recognized as a promising nanotechnology for creating cryptographic schemes due to its low energy consumption, high density, and fast operation capabilities. However, the vulnerability of QCA-based cryptoarchitectures to Power Analysis Attacks (PAA) remains a significant issue. This paper analyzes the security levels of the Serpent cipher, A5/1 stream cipher, and true random number generators (TRNG) designed based on QCA. Additionally, it examines power consumption models in QCA devices, the balance between security and efficiency, and new design approaches to ensure security in nanocommunication.".
References
1. Chan, W. K. (2009). Random Number Generation in Simulation.
2. Gutterman, Z., Pinkas, B., & Reinman, T. (2006). Analysis of the Linux Random Number Generator.
3. Haahr, M. (2011). Introduction to Randomness and Random Numbers.
4. Marsaglia, G. (2005). Random Number Generators.
5. Schneier, B. (2007). Dual_EC_DRBG: A Case Study in Backdoors.
6. Sunar, B., Martin, W., & Stinson, D. (2006). A Provably Secure True Random Number Generator.
7. Eastlake, D., Schiller, J., & Crocker, S. (2005). Randomness Requirements for Security. RFC 4086. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4086
8. Gutterman, Z., Pinkas, B., & Reinman, T. (2006). Analysis of the Linux Random Number Generator. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2006.26
9. Dorrendorf, L., Gutterman, Z., & Pinkas, B. (2007). Cryptanalysis of the Random Number Generator of the Windows Operating System. ACM CCS. https://doi.org/10.1145/1315245.1315274
10. Lacharme, P. (2012). Security flaws in Linux's /dev/random. https://eprint.iacr.org/2012/251
11. Kelsey, J., Schneier, B., Ferguson, N. (1999). Yarrow-160: Notes on the Design and Analysis of the Yarrow Cryptographic Pseudorandom Number Generator. https://www.schneier.com/paper-yarrow.pdf
12. Dodis, Y., et al. (2013). Security Analysis of Pseudorandom Number Generators with Input: /dev/random is not Robust. ACM CCS. https://doi.org/10.1145/2508859.2516661
13. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2012). A Statistical Test Suite for Random and Pseudorandom Number Generators for Cryptographic Applications. NIST SP 800-22 Rev. 1a. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-22r1a
14. Müller, T. (2013). Security of the OpenSSL PRNG. International Journal of Information Security, 12(4), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-013-0213-7
This work is licensed under a 